Many countries are using or developing contact-tracing apps to track the COVID 19 virus among their populations. These apps use Bluetooth to identify which phones a user’s phone has come into close contact with and then notifies those phones if the user reports symptoms or is diagnosed. Some apps collect additional data such as home address/area, GPS location or phone number.

A split has formed between countries choosing to adopt a ‘centralised’ versus a ‘decentralised’ approach to contact-tracing apps.

  • Centralised contact-tracing apps store a user’s Bluetooth ID in a central database as well as the Bluetooth IDs of phones they have come into contact with (and any other data being collected) – enabling better visibility of data by health services or governments. Countries using or planning to use this approach include: China, France, India, Norway and the UK.

  • Decentralised contact-tracing apps only store a user’s Bluetooth ID (and any other data being collected) in a central database and contact-tracing is done at the phone level, without sharing the information centrally – enabling stronger data privacy. Countries using or planning to use this approach include: Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Latvia, Estonia, Finland, Ireland and Canada.

Tech giants Apple and Google, who run mobile phone operating systems iOS and Android, openly back a decentralised approach. They have developed their own platform for decentralised contact-tracing apps and Apple has declined to make their iOS system compatible with a centralised approach (resulting is reduced app functionality and drained phone batteries). As a result, Singapore, Colombia, Australia and Poland - who were planning for or already operating a centralised approach - have signalled that they will move to a decentralised one. 

Centralised and decentralised contact-tracing apps are not fully compatible with each other; making it difficult to trace the virus across borders if countries are using different approaches.

So what?

A key trade-off between approaches is whether to maximise data availability to health services or privacy protections to individuals (see signal of change - Data protection rules are being relaxed across the globe in response to the COVID-19 pandemic). Should it be up to individual governments or companies to make this choice - especially where cross-border cooperation is key?

What lessons can we learn from this challenge to help international monitoring and cooperation on other key cross-border issues, such as climate and biodiversity?

Does the role of tech giants in the centralised / decentralised debate indicate a move towards greater respect for data privacy – or more opportunities to hold governments to ransom?

Signal spotter: Joanie Koh

Sources:

https://techcrunch.com/2020/04/27/germany-ditches-centralized-approach-to-app-for-covid-19-contacts-tracing/ 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-52355028 
https://www.ft.com/content/7416269b-0477-4a29-815d-7e4ee8100c10 
https://www.wired.co.uk/article/nhs-covid-19-tracking-app-contact-tracing 

Photo by Macau Photo Agency on Unsplash


VIEW MORE SIGNALS OF CHANGE



Join over 10,000 professionals receiving our monthly summary of latest signals of change and sensemaking analysis!

Sign up to our newsletter