The UK's population is projected to reach 70 million by 2030.
Project Downloads
Project Overview
Our report Growing Pains aims to stimulate a serious debate by highlighting the massive challenges we face. It calls on policy makers to reclaim the agenda from extremists and start planning now how best to manage growth. Download the full report here.
The UK will need new houses, schools, hospitals and other infrastructure to support millions more people. Demand for food, water and other resources will increase and there will be increased waste and pollution. As the population ages the proportion of people in work and paying taxes will shrink, threatening funding for pensions and public services.
To manage population growth sensitively will take good leadership, investment and innovation. We need to limit growth by making effective family planning services available wherever they are needed. We need to make more efficient use of our resources, by planning better and developing new technologies. And we need to find new ways of leading fulfilling lives that consume fewer resources.
Growing Pains sets out key issues and makes seven recommendations to policy makers.
1. Plan for what’s coming. All major public infrastructure bodies should begin detailed planning to ensure there are adequate public services, infrastructure, jobs and training.
2. Use what we have more efficiently. Zero-carbon homes, maximising the use of technologies based on renewable energy, improved water efficiency, innovative ways to reduce flood risk and an efficient transport system will all be essential. Policy should direct population growth to parts of the UK best able to support it.
3. Rethink ‘growth’. The model which relies on constant population growth to keep the economy vibrant and pay for an ageing population is an unsustainable pyramid scheme. We need to come up with alternative economic models and evaluate success on the basis of well-being and quality of life, not consumption.
4. Develop new attitudes to ageing. We should value the contribution older people can make to society, and adopt a more flexible approach to family, work and education throughout people’s lives. We need more focus on healthier lives throughout old age, not just longer lives.
5. Enhance family planning. We should improve targeted education and make contraception more easily available in the UK and worldwide. In the UK 40% of pregnancies are unplanned. Globally there is a huge unmet demand for contraception with an estimated 350 million women lacking access to the full range of methods.
6. Hold an objective discussion on immigration. We need to understand the value immigration brings to the UK economy. We should also do more to reduce the economic, social and environmental pressures which cause people to migrate from their homes.
7. Have an open and sensible debate. Policy-makers need to address population head-on and reclaim the agenda from the extremist right, not ignore it because it is too controversial.
Growing Pains: Population and Sustainability in the UK, draws on research, workshops with representatives from government agencies, academia, business and voluntary sector organisations, and Forum for the Future’s expertise in sustainability.
* The Office for National Statistics National Population Projections, 2009, projects that the UK population will rise from an estimated 61.4 million in 2008 to 70.6 million in 2030.
Media coverage
Forum for the Future calls for 'open' population debate, BBC, 9th June 2010
Britain must debate rising population - report, Reuters, 9th June 2010
The planet needs family planning, The Guardian, 9th September 2010
Britain will struggle to handle 'catastrophic' population growth unless changes are made, Daily Mail, 9th June 2010
People boom to devour region, Western Daily Press, 10th June 2010
UK population growth needs to be reversed, Ecologist, 9th June
People
Comments
The UK landmass can only support 17 million people this means we rely on imports to support the other 46 million. What happens when third world countries want a fair price for their goods?
The question that people will ask, is why should they pay, through increases in energy, food and other prices, social restrictions, denuded countryside, etc when they as the electorate was not consulted over increased immigration? There seems to have been a lot of smoke and mirrors with migrants being known by different terms and lack of information whether these increases have been the result of bad border management, government policy or EU directive.
i am of the view that the issue really is about greed.untill humanity can learn to control its greed then we are basicly done for.political structures and religious teachings seem to so far have failed to do this.science may have answers,but as i see it religion,politics,science all systems seem to fail in the face of our own evolutionist failings.i therefore conclude that the planet is run by a small percentage of greedy people.the question is are we dealing with an evolutionist problem.lets face it there seems to be very little progress or will to solve these issues from the people with the power to do so.
All these are wonderful things we should do. But nowhere does it say how. It is also difficult to see how much can be done to plan for population growth when government policy, particularly under the last Labour government and for the for the last decade, has been and is to encourage the population to grow as fast as possible by promoting large scale immigration and by generously subsidising families with large numbers of children.
This article indicates that this population increase poses problems which need to be addressed. You will get nowhere because limiting population increase is against government policy.
I think the reason for this blind acceptance of an ever- rising population is simple. Money. In the short term there's 'loads of money' involved in 'managing' an ever increasing population - as this article unwittingly points out. More houses, shops, roads, jobs - more of everything will be needed, which will fill the coffers of the greedy immoral despots who run this country.
Hiding under the cloak of 'liberalism' and 'tolerance', they don't really give a damn about this country,And when the country is uninhabitable they can move somewhere else to retire.
Population growth is a pyramid scheme that will destroy the quality of life for many.
The word "bigger" needs to be changed for the word "better"..the sooner the better.
Maybe we need to be intelligent about this, the majority of this `explosion` is due to the flood gates of immigration being opened by Mr Blair and his vision-less cronies 15 years ago.
Most immigrant famillies still produce between 5 & 8 offspring, and are still being paid to do so by the benefit system.
We now pay more on benefits than we collect in tax and the NAO, a while ago produced figures showing how the vast majority of Bangladeshi & Somali families ( 90% ish) live off state handouts, Strangely this info seems to have been pulled, however...
Address immigration and the child benefit system together with other hand outs and we will soon see a reduction in the exponential population figures, The coffee is on, but we have yet to wake up and smell it!!!
I find the reports of population growth in the UK (but in the world too), and the impact, really terrifying. In the last few years I have seen so much local green space disappear under housing estates, and our plans to move house a little out of the urban area have come to a standstill on hearing of the plans for 25,000 houses in our planned vicinity. This is absolutely not a 'race' issue, it is simply a numbers issue - the UK is a densely over populated island. We have the most fabulous countryside, pretty villages, and lovely places to go on holiday right on our doorstep, so why allow these to be destroyed? I was interested to see on TV the recent debate by a representative of the National Trust and a government minister on the planned changes to planning legislation, and the potential catastrophic impact on our environment, and the comments by CPRE - yes, my local green space matters a great deal to me. What is the point of allowing everything that makes our UK environment fabulous, and makes one's local environment worth investing in, be destroyed? Once it has gone, what will there be left for people living here? I keep reading worrying media reports about all this, but isn't anyone thinking past the next election? Why aren't the 'key players' whoever they are, having informed debate about this, before extremists capture the issue? At least being an island we could potentially manage our own affairs.
At what point in the increasing population is the house building going to stop and acknowledgment that there's a 'people excess' not a 'housing shortage' going to occur.
Add your comment