Carbon labelling is often touted as a way of enabling consumers to shop sustainably. But is trialling carbon labels just a PR exercise or can communicating the climate change impacts of everyday products to consumers genuinely drive consumer behaviour for the better?
Forum for the Future’s independent research on this subject – sponsored by Lloyd’s Register – included consumer focus groups, expert interviews and surveys. The aim was to explore the role that carbon labelling has to play if the goal is a low-carbon shopping basket.
Culminating in our report, Check-out carbon, the research highlighted that we need a much more strategic, prioritised approach to messages about the climate change impacts of products. Businesses need to give consumers genuine options, rather than just information. Consumers also want business and government to help them shop sustainably by removing the worst offending products from the shelves.
Check-out carbon first identifies the key debates around carbon labelling before providing practical recommendations for moving these debates forward.
Peter Madden, CEO of Forum for the Future, speaks about carbon labelling in the video below:
For supporting information and research data, click here.
The research found that consumers want to use their shopping power to tackle climate change, but they need clear information on what to buy and how to use products.
The report proposes key steps for government, retailers and manufacturers to achieve a low-carbon shopping basket:
Dan Crossley, lead author of the report, says: “Labels showing energy ratings on white goods and cars have shown how labelling can drive behaviour, both in business and amongst consumers. But carbon labelling is only one tool and won’t work on its own. Businesses also need to have substance behind their communications and show that they are working hard to reduce not just the carbon impacts, but the broader sustainability impacts, of their products.”