What’s the price of a cow in Nepal got to do with climate change? A lot, says David Nussbaum. The new chief executive of WWF-UK has carbon credits, water, and China on his mind.
Peter Denton: You were formerly chief executive of global anti-corruption organisation Transparency International (TI). Going from tackling corruption to tackling the environment is quite a step – is there any crossover?
David Nussbaum: There is certainly someoverlap – illegal logging, for example, is a form of corruption and a form of environmental vandalism. Both corruption and the environment are huge global issues affecting the future of the planet and the lives of everybody to some extent.
PD: Your experience at TI, and Oxfam andTraidcraft before that, must have influenced your thinking on international trade and its effects on the environment…
DN: Of course trade brings economic benefits– greater efficiency, economies of scale, that kind of thing. Economic theory shows that trade should make everybody better off, or it can do in the idealised world that most economists inhabit! But it does raise environmental issues too, not least the energy consumption of moving goods round the world. And for me, there’s a further issue – we need to look at some of the ways in which the international system is regulated and structured. For example, the EU Common Agricultural Policy, and the American government subsidies on some of its farming products, have a huge impact on poor and developing countries, and that’s something I’d like to see action on.
PD: But can economic growth be aligned with the environment?
DN: We have to find a way for that to happen. Most countries are focused on economic wellbeing and growth. Our task is to find the growth that’s consistent with environmental concerns. I visited some villages in Nepal where they’d installed biogas plants. Great – the methane that would have been going into the atmosphere is now used as fuel which is less polluting; fewer trees are being felled for fuel; and people’s health is better because they haven’t got smoky fires in their homes. But biogas costs about the price of a cow or a buffalo to install, and that’s a lot of money for a family in these poor villages. If we could get carbon credits for people putting biogas plants in their homes, it could help pay for their installation. It’s entirely possible.
PD: Here in the UK, WWF has been working with business for many years. Where do you see this relationship going?
DN: The best of what I’ve seen of WWF’s work with business and industry is when there are multiple aspects to the partnership. First, it’s about us influencing that organisation’s policies and practices. Then it’s about the influence that can be brought on its suppliers and their environmental behaviour. Third, it’s to do with going out there together and doing something– getting messages across to the public, the organisation’s staff, its customers and so on. The best of our relationships work when there are all these tracks.
PD: But there’s also a financial aspect...
DN: Yes indeed there is. We aim to raise funds from our business partners to do our conservation work effectively. I very much hope we can extend our partnerships across different industry sectors and build our links with individual companies, groups of companies and even industry associations. In the end, it’s to do with mutual benefit.
10 October 2007
Add new comment