A fascinating read and raises, for me, far more issues of interest than I could have imagined.
New ideas are needed if the water sector is to meet the immense challenges of growing demand and higher energy costs, says the CEO of i2O Water.
Rapidly increasing populations and economic development in emerging markets mean an ever increasing demand for water, while ageing infrastructures, rising energy costs and climate change are having an impact on water utilities worldwide.
We urgently require new ideas and new ways of doing things. However, in many countries, incentives for innovation are weak and water utilities are slow to adopt new technology.
Supplying water is a monopoly, so water utilities are either state owned or operate in a regulatory framework. It is therefore governments, and the regulatory incentives that they put in place, that drive innovation – or the lack of it.
The fastest uptake of water-saving technology occurs in countries where some of the right incentives for innovation are already in place. For instance, i2O’s Advanced Pressure Management solution has been most rapidly implemented in countries where water is given an economic value. In Malaysia, the largest water provider, SYABAS, is now saving 40 million litres per day, thanks to our technology. It was very easy for SYABAS to calculate the payback of investing in i2O as they buy their water for approximately £0.15/m3, which reflects the real economic value of the water. If similar clarity existed for utilities in other countries, water company engineers could quickly evaluate new technology and projects to check whether or not they were viable.
If we are to solve the massive challenges faced by the water sector, we need regulation that encourages innovation. We need governments and regulators to give water a real economic value and ensure that the true cost of water is passed on to consumers and customers, with safeguards for the poorest – rather than subsidising it through the tax system and ignoring the environmental costs. This will incentivise solutions that reduce consumption, such as water recycling or the improvement of industrial processes.
An additional benefit of giving water an economic value is that its price correlates to its availability, varying significantly from one water resource zone to another. This ensures that incentives are greatest in areas where water is most scarce.
If governments have the courage to allow water utilities to pass on the true cost of water to their customers, their appetite for innovation will increase, working with dynamic suppliers and technology providers to develop solutions to the massive problems we face.
Adam Kingdon is CEO, i20 Water.
Photo: i20 Water
Overseas House, 19 - 23 Ironmonger Row,
London, EC1V 3QN.
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7324 3660
post@greenfutures.org.uk
© 2011 Forum for the Future | Terms of Use | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Site Map | Login | Logout
The Forum for the Future is a registered charity and a company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales. Registered office: Overseas House, 19-23 Ironmonger Row, London, EC1V 3QN, UK. Registered charity no. GB 162 3473 19. Company no. 2959712. VAT registration no.162347319
Comments
Entirely agree, Adam. I work in the area of innovation in the (UK and European) water sector and see much evidence of excellent technology development at the company level but of course there is no point developing the kit/software/infrastructure if there are regulatory barriers or a lack of market drivers.
Where the full economic value of water is recognized and priced accordingly then innovative ways to treat, pump, conserve, reuse and generally manage water will follow. Ways that cost less or achieve more for the same money.
The water sector is a weird quasi-market. How weird depends on where in the world you are located and how much direct political interference there is in the water and sewage utility sector, how strictly abstraction rights are enforced, whether the private ownership of utilities can be arbitrarily over-ridden and so on. In the absence of a free market (I am not aware of any) there are mechanisms to promote and encourage innovation. I am involved with a number in the UK and aware of many such initiatives worldwide but in the main they are organized from the ground-up (i.e. they are supply-chain initiatives).
Three cheers for (smart) regulation and incentives!
Add your comment