• About
  • Partners
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Syndicate
  • Opportunities
  • Publications
  • Contact
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on Facebook
Green Futures RSS Feed
Join our Newsletter
All GreenFutures
  • All
  • Business
  • Design
  • Ecosystems
  • Energy
  • Food
  • Society
  • Special Editions
  • Forum for the Future

Jonathon Porritt: We talk green, but we buy brown

17th January, 2013 by Jonathon Porritt | 2 comments

We've moved from Nanny State to Nanny Corp. Now, it's time consumers shouldered their responsibility, argues the Founder-Director of Forum for the Future.

I honestly can't remember when I last heard anybody argue that the sustainability revolution we so urgently need will be driven primarily by consumers.

There have been times when such a view was strongly favoured, going right back to that original classic, The Green Consumer, by John Elkington and Julia Hailes in 1988. That particular surge of consumer interest in all things green fizzled out ingloriously a few years later, and every subsequent resurrection seems paler and paler by comparison.

So where does the consumer fit in when it comes to analysing the potential for change? For a start, we’ve pretty much given up on our politicians doing anything substantial about today’s converging sustainability crises. It seems they’ll only act when they’re ‘given permission’ to act by others: by the private sector, for instance, or, occasionally, by voters. Worse yet, we’ve completely given up on investors, as they’ve proved themselves incapable of doing anything other than sticking to their short-term profit-maximisation story. 

The NGOs are still doing good stuff, but with much less traction than we would all like to see and, though we haven’t exactly given up on the voters, in the round you would have to say they don’t seem to be particularly engaged! Which is why such a huge burden of responsibility now sits on the shoulders of leading companies – and why this seems to be the only place where real leadership can currently be detected.

Not that they’re acting on their own. They still depend on government not to screw up (in terms of bad regulation, inconsistent incentivisation and so on), and indeed they depend on their investors not taking fright. But, from personal experience, I know that they have very low expectations of both – as they do of their consumers. Recent years have taken the shine off the idea of ‘green consumerism’.  Every survey that purports to demonstrate significant levels of consumer concern is automatically discounted by companies because of the yawning ‘say–do gap’: we talk green, but we buy brown. 

A minority of consumers stay loyal to organic food and fair trade products and, outside of the UK, numbers have actually been growing over the last few years – despite the economic recession.

But any hope that more sustainable products might command a premium evaporated years ago. The vast majority of consumers are astonished at the idea that cheap is often synonymous with destructive, unhealthy, irresponsible and cruel. And the sad truth of it is that a disturbingly large percentage of UK consumers are either too lazy or too indifferent to lead a more sustainable lifestyle.

You’ll not hear any of our corporate partners express such heretical views. They never do it in public, and only very rarely in private. And you’ll not hear any of the campaigning NGOs express such views either. They love beating up on the corporates, but they won’t beat up on the consumers who support those corporates in their unsustainable ways. Too many of them could be members, or prospective members… 

All you hear about today is what companies can do to ‘enable’ or ‘empower’ their consumers – in terms of product innovation, reducing risk in the supply chain, increased transparency, ‘doing the right thing’ and so on. Ok, I exaggerate to make a point. It is of course brilliant that fair trade, organic and niche ethical brands continue to thrive in these troubled times. But there is something worrying about the current state of play.

Not so long ago the prevailing view was that governments would sort it out on our behalf – poor, deluded fools that we were! Now we’ve transferred that semi-detached dependency onto the corporate world, indeed onto the very multinationals we once looked to governments to regulate the hell out of! We’ve moved from one illusory comfort blanket to another – this one market-friendly, seductively branded, and reassuringly undemanding. From Nanny State to Nanny Corp – ‘editing our choices’, doing the heavy lifting on water, carbon or waste, refurbishing that yellow brick road to the land of notionally sustainable consumption…

This is a funny one for us to get our heads around. Forum for the Future spends every waking moment urging companies to do more. And more. Given the economic backdrop, what today’s leading companies are doing – with no support from governments, near zero interest from investors, and very little limited affirmation from mainstream consumers – occasionally borders on the astonishing. And you know what? That’s simply not sustainable.

Jonathon Porritt is Founder Director of Forum for the Future.

Featured in

Front cover of issue 87
No.87 - January 2013
Add your comment »

Comments

William Juones (not verified), 25 January 2013 - 17:28
  • reply

I too have been astonished by the lead the corportate world is taking - but now take a differnet view from you -and it came completely as a suprise to me. I was drawn recently to an investment announced by the University of Oxford into a resource efficiency based equities strategy. I tracked down the investment company to see if could learn more and was suprised to see that the portfolio consists of the largest companies in the world who are implementing efficiency startegies to mitigate reource consumption - from what appears to be an economic not a social imperative. Companies we have all heard of - boeing, unilver, Loreal, Procter & Gamble Ebay Accenture - all appear to be doing something fundamenatlly different to their peer group to make themselves more efficient. This seems to be providing better returns to shareholders as well. so it appears to be a win win,. So we can moan about buyng brown versus green, but unless we take greater steps to understand and celebrate what some of the biggest companies are doing and continue to do - ie less of the stick and more of the carrot we end up shooting oursleves in the foot. Some change is better than no change

Robert Walker (not verified), 17 January 2013 - 20:35
  • reply

It would be appropriate to distinguish between conventional investment institutions that do nothing to address environmental and social challenges from those socially responsible investors with corporate engagement programs in place. Many of these institutions have established track records of success when it comes to moving companies down a path towards more sustainable and responsible practices.

Elsie Maio (not verified), 17 January 2013 - 19:47
  • reply

Got it. And let's stop calling ourselves 'consumers.' A name can become a self-fulfilling prophecy. What behavior and role would be more appropriate for the people in a conscious, sustainable world?

Add your comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
Please type in the letters and numbers that you see. This is to establish that you are in fact a human being. Case sensitive.
/
g
4
>
X
X
/
M
Enter the code without spaces and pay attention to upper/lower case.

GF88 subscribe

Apex Award Winner for Publication Excellence

Article filter

Advert for GF smartphone app, GF inspire

Advertise block

Adventures in Sustainability

Bristol BIG Green Week, 15 - 23 June

GF88 subscribe

Advertise block

GF88 publications

I love the satellite shots in the latest issue especially, really beautiful.

Adam Oxford
  • About
  • Partners
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Syndicate
  • Opportunities
  • Publications
  • Contact

Recent Back Issues

No.88 - April 2013
Cover image of issue 88
No.87 - January 2013
Front cover of issue 87
No.86 - October 2012
No.85 - July 2012
Front cover

Recent Special Editions

India: Innovation Nation
Futuristas
Water Works
Beyond the Finish
Front cover of Beyond the Finish Edition

Most Read Articles

We have to remap our minds, says Hollender
Wednesday, 01 August 2012 by Anna Simpson | 43,122 views
Enzyme turns polluted air into fuel
Thursday, 11 November 2010 by Anonymous | 42,956 views
Making Density Desirable
Wednesday, 21 May 2003 by admin | 19,828 views
From the Editor
Monday, 21 August 2006 by admin | 19,716 views
Jonathon Porritt: Why do we play down the horror of climate change?
Thursday, 11 October 2012 by Jonathon Porritt | 19,668 views
The world's first city for robots
Wednesday, 08 August 2012 by Anonymous | 15,382 views
Will supply rule the food chain?
Tuesday, 19 April 2011 by Anonymous | 13,871 views
The power of the sun in a nuclear state
Monday, 14 December 2009 by Anonymous | 13,680 views
Are we on the cusp of a third industrial revolution?
Thursday, 19 January 2012 by Martin Wright | 13,390 views
Solving the energy storage conundrum
Thursday, 04 October 2012 by Anonymous | 13,087 views
Offsets spark clean change
Wednesday, 22 December 2010 by Martin Wright | 12,281 views
Electric motor racing comes of age
Monday, 23 April 2012 by Anonymous | 12,024 views

Published by Forum for the Future

Contact Green Futures

Overseas House, 19 - 23 Ironmonger Row,
London, EC1V 3QN.

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7324 3660
post@greenfutures.org.uk

 Sign up to our newsletter

© 2011 Forum for the Future | Terms of Use | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Site Map | Login | Logout

Site built by : New Digital Partnership

The Forum for the Future is a registered charity and a company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales. Registered office: Overseas House, 19-23 Ironmonger Row, London, EC1V 3QN, UK. Registered charity no. 1040519. Company no. 2959712. VAT registration no. 677 7475 70