Consistently provides a wealth of stories and case studies, well written and richly illustrated. I keep all the back copies and regularly delve into them to find material.
Engineers claim to reverse impact of carbon-intensive industry
Traditional (or Portland) cement is made by heating limestone and clay in giant kilns to around 1,500°C. The vast amounts of energy needed to heat the raw materials, along with the chemical reactions as the limestone decomposes, produces a hefty 0.83 tonnes of CO2 for every tonne of cement, according to the International Energy Agency. When it’s mixed with water for use in building, each tonne absorbs up to 0.4 tonnes of CO2. But that still leaves net carbon emissions of over 0.4 tonnes CO2 for each tonne of cement in use.
Now Novacem (a spin-off company from London’s Imperial College) is developing a cement based on magnesium oxide, derived from mineral silicates. This material requires heating at the much lower temperature of 650°C, and emits less than 0.5 tonnes of CO2 per tonne of cement produced. But crucially, it has the potential to absorb large amounts of CO2 as it hardens.
The Novacem team are now working with WSP Group, Laing O’Rourke and Rio Tinto Minerals to assess the material’s feasibility, and test its efficacy. If tests prove its suitability for large-scale construction projects, they expect it to be on the market within five years.
MPA Cement (formerly the British Cement Association) believes this timeline could be overly optimistic. Senior Standards Manager Mike Taylor points out that it may be hard to find enough magnesium silicate minerals to manufacture the cement on a commercial scale in the UK – although the minerals are abundant worldwide. Transporting them to manufacturing sites will have a significant environmental impact, he warns.
But it’s the cement’s performance as a construction material that will be key to its success. Unless it is able to replace the Portland variety on a large scale, says Taylor, it won’t have a significant impact on climate change. – Giovanna Dunmall
Overseas House, 19 - 23 Ironmonger Row,
London, EC1V 3QN.
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7324 3660
post@greenfutures.org.uk
© 2011 Forum for the Future | Terms of Use | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Site Map | Login | Logout
The Forum for the Future is a registered charity and a company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales. Registered office: Overseas House, 19-23 Ironmonger Row, London, EC1V 3QN, UK. Registered charity no. 1040519. Company no. 2959712. VAT registration no. 677 7475 70
Comments
I find that to manufacture more products to reduce pollution is like trying to eat one’s tail. Why don’t we focus more on reducing the emissions from the onset so that resources are freed up to pave way for other, more constructive and REALLY environmentally sound products?
I heard about this revolutionary invention years ago on National Public Radio, but since have heard nothing. What is happening with this, it seems like it should be something that would be beneficial to be put into production immediately.
Regards,
Kath
upvc fascia and soffit
Add your comment