• About
  • Partners
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Syndicate
  • Opportunities
  • Publications
  • Contact
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on Facebook
Green Futures RSS Feed
All GreenFutures
  • All
  • Design
  • Ecosystems
  • Energy
  • Finance
  • Food
  • Futures
  • Special Editions
  • Forum for the Future

Eat the change, says WWF's Dax Lovegrove

26th August, 2009 by Anonymous | Add a comment

Greening the food industry means more than picking the low-hanging fruit.Dax Lovegrovepoints outwhat really needs to change in the food chain.

 

What have plastic bags, food miles and rooftop turbines got in common? They’re all issues that have tended to hog the headlines on sustainability in the food industry. Because quick wins grab consumers’ attention, retailers and manufacturers have tended to get distracted by these smaller operational changes, rather than looking at their overall ecological footprint.

In fact, most of the greenhouse gas emissions created by the food system (almost a fifth of the UK’s total) are down to production rather than operations such as the running of stores and offices. For example, last year’s Cooking up a Storm report from the University of Surrey found that most of the impacts from meat and dairy products, which account for about half of the UK food sector’s total greenhouse emissions, come from rearing livestock. It’s clear to us at WWF that food retailers and processors have a crucial role to play here: they are the link between production and consumption.

WWF has launched the One Planet Food Strategy to help progressive businesses get to the heart of these issues. Its premise is that we need to reduce emissions from Britain’s food economy by at least 70% within the next four decades. That’s a big ask – and we know that it will be a tough engagement process.

However, there are signs that mindsets are shifting within the industry: where once reputation management drove change, more material issues are starting to spur action instead. Resource efficiency and climate safety are fast becoming business assets, thanks to penalties on emissions – under the forthcoming Carbon Reduction Commitment – and a growing awareness that changing rainfall patterns could have a devastating impact on vital water supplies.

Water is only now beginning to receive serious attention, but crises in many parts of the world are already threatening business supply chains. Cotton, for example, is one of the thirstiest crops, but is often sourced from countries such as Pakistan where water availability is in rapid decline. Companies that are still not assessing the water volumes, impacts and risks in their supply chains will no doubt be vulnerable in future.

WWF is helping big businesses to focus on these critical issues today. For example, we run farmer field schools in India, Pakistan and other countries on which companies such as Marks & Spencer and Ikea are increasingly reliant for labour and products. We’ve shown farming students how to reduce their use of irrigated water, pesticides and fertilisers by up to a third or more. Retailers not only reduce their overall water footprint this way, but also their emissions – in the form of less nitrous oxide from agrichemicals, for example, and less carbon from the cleaning and transportation of water.

Through the Water Footprint Network, which WWF helped set up, we’re working with major businesses such as SABMiller, Coca-Cola and Cadbury to develop water practices that benefit local communities, wildlife and industry.

Meanwhile, pressure is also mounting on food retailers and processors to source commodities responsibly. There are a whole host of ethical and environmental decisions they must make on foodstuffs like palm oil, soy, fish, sugar, meat and dairy. We’re working with them on how to engage suppliers and local communities in improved farming practices, through forums such as the Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil and the Better Sugarcane Initiative. WWF is also engaging with some of the global food processing companies – so that they can leverage their purchasing power to drive best practice in the field.

Early indications from a study carried out for us by Imperial College show that greening farming practices, along with efficiencies and technological advancements in the supply chain, could take us a long way towards the UK’s mid-term carbon reduction target (34% by 2020). But hitting the 2050 target of an 80% reduction in overall carbon emissions will also require a change in diets. Cutting down on meat and dairy will be important in the long term, but encouraging consumers to do so won’t be straightforward.

Here, again, retailers will be key. Supermarkets, the dominant players on the UK food scene, will have to extend their role beyond simply responding to consumer demand, to shaping it.

Food businesses that are to survive in a resource-constrained future, and minimise their vulnerability to the ‘ecological crunch’, are going to need some well thought out sustainability strategies. We want to work with the pioneers to help shape a One Planet Food system.

Dax Lovegrove is Head of Business and Industry Relations at WWF-UK.WWF-UK is a Forum for the Future partner.

Add your comment »

Comments

Jake Backus (not verified), 1 September 2009 - 08:28
  • reply

As Dax suggests, doing what we do, better, won't get us all the way, and instead fundamental changes in behaviour are required.

Most power lies with consumers and voters, but they fail to act decisively and cohesively. Therefore, information and self interest are key. The main barriers being, information, convenience, viable alternatives and price.

On information, comparing suppliers of similar products has little material benefit, but instead, comparative information across categories or e.g. non dairy / meat alternatives is required to make lifestyle changes. Who is best placed to raise this debate with shoppers? Are retailers ready to do this? Clearly it needs to be across the board.

Personally, making the change has not been as challenging as anticipated, but the level of motivation still needs to be very high.

So I come to price and self interest. Perhaps we should reduce subsidies on livestock and butter mountains, and promote more sustainable alternatives with farmers. Since this might also be healthier, it could be a win-win for the government and society in general. I cannot say the impact on farmers, but perhaps they might require less land for the equivalent nutritional output.

Add your comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Case insensitive.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Advert for subscriptions to GF

Advert for Green Futures Inspire

Article filter

Advertise block

Advert for the Co-operative Opportunity event

BIT's 1st Annual World Congress of Biodiversity 2012 advert

Advert for sustainability live and other events

Subscriptions advert

Advertise block

Browse our archive

I love the satellite shots in the latest issue especially, really beautiful.

Adam Oxford
  • About
  • Partners
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Syndicate
  • Opportunities
  • Publications
  • Contact

Recent Back Issues

No.83 - January 2012
No.82 - October 2011
Cover image of issue 82
No.81 - July 2011
Cover image of issue
No.80 - April 2011

Recent Special Editions

Retro and Fit
Cover shot of Retro and Fit
Moving Mountains
Cover image of Moving Mountains
Under New Management
Tomorrow's food, tomorrow's farms

Most Read Articles

Enzyme turns polluted air into fuel
Thursday, 11 November 2010 by Anonymous | 16,156 views | 0 comments
From the Editor
Monday, 21 August 2006 by admin | 6,370 views | 0 comments
The power of the sun in a nuclear state
Monday, 14 December 2009 by Anonymous | 4,822 views | 0 comments
Government hesitation on solar farms: a major setback for green growth?
Thursday, 30 June 2011 by Anonymous | 4,570 views | 2 comments
Floating solar offers a cool solution to a hot topic
Friday, 05 August 2011 by Roger East | 4,194 views | 0 comments
What is the future of flying?
Tuesday, 04 October 2011 by Peter Madden | 3,753 views | 0 comments
Sherford: one of a new wave of UK eco-towns
Wednesday, 15 June 2011 by Anonymous | 3,710 views | 1 comment
New reactor turns sunlight into fuel
Monday, 20 June 2011 by Lucy Tooher | 3,340 views | 1 comment
Will supply rule the food chain?
Tuesday, 19 April 2011 by Anonymous | 3,300 views | 0 comments
Offsets spark clean change
Wednesday, 22 December 2010 by Martin Wright | 3,209 views | 1 comment
Pressure exerted by sunbeams harnessed for energy
Wednesday, 22 June 2011 by Anonymous | 3,133 views | 1 comment
Are we on the cusp of a third industrial revolution?
Thursday, 19 January 2012 by Martin Wright | 3,041 views | 3 comments

Published by Forum for the Future

Contact Green Futures

Overseas House, 19 - 23 Ironmonger Row,
London, EC1V 3QN.

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7324 3660
post@greenfutures.org.uk

© 2011 Forum for the Future | Terms of Use | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Site Map | Login | Logout

Site built by : New Digital Partnership

The Forum for the Future is a registered charity and a company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales. Registered office: Overseas House, 19-23 Ironmonger Row, London, EC1V 3QN, UK. Registered charity no. 1040519. Company no. 2959712. VAT registration no. 677 7475 70